Police officers have become the targets of violent activists who are seeking to upend America as we know it. Heather Mac Donald, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and author of The War on Cops, breaks down the myths behind “systemic racism” and “police brutality.”
Let’s pay attention to facts.
Candace starts her show by pointing our attention to a video that she saw circulating on the internet. It was a caucasian couple sitting in a Washington DC restaurant. A mob of Black Lives Matter “activists” decided to storm the restaurant and demand that people in the restaurant raise their fists in the air and gave the black power salute.
A young caucasian couple decided that they would not raise their fists in the air and give a black power salute. So the woman, who appears to be the group leader, proceeded to yell obscenities at them until finally, after realizing that the couple wasn’t going to buckle to the mob’s pressure, they left.
The conversation takes off from there and is quite interesting.
Black lives matter is a hate group. There is nothing nice about black lives matter. They are happy to use violent tactics. They are happy to use scare tactics. They are happy to burn. They are happy to riot. They are happy to loot to accomplish their goals.
On Monday, Apr 27 and Tuesday, Apr 28, 2020, an America’s Frontline Doctors held a “White Coat Summit” on Capitol Hill. They’ve addressed “a massive disinformation campaign” surrounding the SARS-CoV-2.”
The goal of the two-day summit, organized by the Tea Party Patriots, is to create a platform for the doctors to talk directly to American people. Practicing physicians grew tired of being forced to follow guidelines established by bureaucrats with PhDs, who have not treated any patients for several decades, and decided to push back.
America’s Frontline Doctors state on their websites that:
American life has fallen casualty to a massive disinformation campaign. We can speculate on how this has happened, and why it has continued, but the purpose of the inaugural White Coat Summit is to empower Americans to stop living in fear.
If Americans continue to let so-called experts and media personalities make their decisions, the great American experiment of a Constitutional Republic with Representative Democracy, will cease.
America’s Frontline Doctors Summit (Download these videos before YouTube deletes them.)
(Updated 07,28 2020) Youtube deleted this video. You can still watch it HERE.
I’m going to close this post on a funny note. One of the most vocal doctors, if it comes to supporting the use of Hydroxychloroquine in the fight against COVID-19, has challenged Dr. Fauci to prove that he didn’t take HCQ as a preventive measure against the virus.
COVID doctor challenges CNN and Fauci to take a urine test. “Prove you arn’t taking hydroxychloroquine.”
I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for a response from Dr. Fauci.
(Updated 07,28 2020) Video which was a part of the above tweet was taken down by Twitter. “This Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules“
On January 30, 2020, Rep. Henry C. “Hank,” Johnson,Jr. [D-GA-4] introduced House Bill H.R. 5717 – Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act of 2020, which, according to Rep. Johnson, is intentioned to…,
…end the epidemic of gun violence and build safer communities by strengthening Federal firearms laws and supporting gun violence research, intervention, and prevention initiatives.
In reality, this bill will make it much more difficult, if not impossible, for law-abiding citizens to defend themselves and their property against criminals. It will also pump vast amounts of money (from taxes) into coffers of anti-second amendment groups and organizations.
Tax on guns: 30% Tax on ammo: 50%.
H.R. 5717 provisions include:
raise the age to purchase from 18 to 21
adds 30% tax (on top of sales tax) on all guns purchases *
adds 50% tax (on top of sales tax) on all ammo purchases *
license req. ‘d to buy guns/ammo **
license req. ‘d for owned guns ** * Proceeds will finance Community Violence Intervention Grant Program. ** The Attorney General will issue or deny a 10-year license.
People say there’s a long way to go before H.R. 5717 will have a chance to become the law. It has to pass the House and the Senate and then be signed by the President. I agree. As it is, this proposal has a little chance to end up on the President’s desk.
BUT… (there’s always a but). Everything is possible.
Do you remember those first lawsuits against tobacco companies? Judges were throwing them out of the courtrooms while puffing on their cigarettes. Look now, a few decades later, smoking a cigarette can land you in jail.
So, because H.R. 5717, if it passes, will render every law-abiding gun owner a felon, I think it’s undoubtedly a good idea to call your Congressman at (202) 224-3121 (Rep. list by state) and press him or her to oppose this bill. NOW!
Angry mobs have threatened people throughout history. But now there’s a new kind — Online mobs.
Because people are afraid to challenge them, it just takes one employee at one company to say, “Here’s the law that protects my rights to feel safe and comfortable … If you’re not making me feel safe … I’m going to get you in trouble. I might even sue you.”
Are State Health Departments changing definitions to manipulate data?
According to the new Health Departments’ guidance, anyone who comes into contact with a person who tested positive for COVID-19 is now also considered positive.
Current Case Definition: • Confirmed case of COVID‐19 Positive PCR lab result for COVID‐19 is required
New Case Definition: • Confirmed case definition (No change in case definition) Need a positive PCR lab result for COVID‐19
• NEW Probable case definition: FDA approved positive lab with or without symptoms Close contact with confirmed or probable cases • NEW Case definition for deaths related to COVID‐19 COVID‐19 is listed on the death certificate as a cause of death Positive PCR lab result for COVID‐19 is no longer required
A short video by Fog City Midge explains unusual changes in the way new COVID-19 cases are calculated.
We are dealing with a brilliant string of a virus, a member of the Democrat party, that becomes dormant during violent riots and is only dangerous to attendees of peaceful political rallies, specifically those organized by Trump supporters.
COVID-19 is the first virus ever with a political agenda. It wants to:
Destroy U.S. economy (and use it against the current president).
Shut down rallies and political campaigning efforts of President Trump (to hide any signs of support for current president).
Prevent face to face Trump vs. Biden debates (Biden can’t win those).
Force the use of mail-in ballots (because it’s easier to commit voter fraud).
And then take full control over our lives.
We are dealing with an extremely dangerous virus. It’s smart, ruthless, and will never stop multiplying. Luckily, the vaccine is coming — it’s called elections.
We’ve placed a public interest notice on this Tweet for violating our policy against abusive behavior…,
More and more (mostly conservative) accounts on Twitter get these notices, and more and more get thrown out of the platform every day. Most of the instances of “unlucky” Twitter users being dealt with by Twitter Thought Police go unnoticed. Still, when high profile conservative gets lectured — like POTUS — or kicked out — like Katie Hopkins or Carpe Donktum — everyone talks about it and things start to happen.
500,000 Social Media Users Moved To PARLER!
The first time I’ve written about Parler was a little over a year ago after company’s CEO John Matze’s appearance on Ingraham Angle. At that time, Parler had a little over 100,000 users, today it has over 1.5 million.
Devin Nunes with John Matze — the CEO of the social network Parler.
Of course, 1.5 million looks laughable compared to over 330 million active users on the Twitter platform. Still, Parley’s numbers are growing fast, and these are mostly high-quality users, meaning — people with disposable income.
Efforts on the part of Twitter to ban, suspend, and censor prominent conservative voices from its platform forced them and their followers to look for other options. Parler — a social media platform with functionally similar to Twitter, but without the censorship — seems like a perfect replacement.
The big names that have set up Parler accounts recently include:
Many of these personalities continue to use Twitter but promote Parler to their followers. Some also re-post their Parler content on their Twitter accounts.
Katie Hopkins and Carpe Donktum recently joined the platform after being removed from Twitter. Katie isn’t the only high profile Brit who joined Parler. Some Conservative Members of Parlament have joined the platform. These include the MP for Mansfield Ben Bradley, MP for Guildford Angela Richardson, and MP for Wycombe Steve Baker.
Is Jack Dorsey destroying Twitter?
It appears that Jack Dorsey wants to purge his platform off all conservatives. Still, in reality, his actions force any user, not just conservative, with even traces of common sense, to re-evaluate Twitter as a social media platform. People, in general, don’t like to be patronized by some condescending “superior intellect.”
If Jack does not change his attitude towards independent thinkers, Twitter will be over-run by supporters of Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber, and Barack Obama. It means that only children, teenagers, college students, and adults who believe that everything they need should be provided free of charge, will use Twitter.
People who have jobs, run small businesses, receive good pensions, and are willing to spend their hard-earned money — the kind of people that corporations want to advertise their products to, will move somewhere else.
Because no business will pay to advertise its product or service to people who are not interested in paying for it, Twitter will become a platform filled with hundreds of millions of users with zero commercial value to advertisers.
On the other hand, Parler will have a much leaner user base but with much more to offer for those ready to pay for access to those users. Quality over quantity. Always.
Larry Elder comments on nonexistent systemic police racism, the rise of “revenge culture,” affirmative action, the Black Lives Matter movement.
He brings an example of Professor of Economics Roland Fryer of Harvard University who studied if the police disproportionately use deadly force against black people. To Fryer’s surprise,
Not only were the police not using deadly force disproportionately against blacks, they were more hesitant more reluctant to pull the trigger on a black suspect than on the white suspect presumably because they were afraid of being accused of being racist
by organization like Black Lives Matter — which, as its co-founder, Patrisse Cullors, explains: “are trained Marxists (trained by whom?),” and Larry Elder describes as:
A left-wing movement that’s hostile in my opinion to the values that made this country great, and it’s built upon this phony narrative that the police are out to get black people when in fact, the studies show the opposite.
And then continues saying that it is:
One thing just to have a stupid point of view, lots of people have stupid points of view that are harmless. This [BLM] is harmful.
Another harmful movement is the so-called cancel culture, which Elder calls revenge culture. People apply today’s standards to the past and then want to ban or destroy whatever, or whoever it is that offends them. HBO pulling Gone with the Wind from its streaming service is just the latest example.
The idea of that you’re going to go around and find all the things that offend you from the sensibilities of somebody living in 2020. It’s absurd. The film [Gone with the Wind] was made in 1939,
and the book was published in 1936, that’s over 80 years ago.
Elder also touches on the idea of affirmative action. He views it as a dangerous concept. Lowering standards for a specific group of people is disrespectful and causes others to question their qualifications.
When I get on the airplane, and I see a black pilot, I don’t want to know about affirmative action. I want to make sure that this guy aced his pilot exam, and he’s there because he’s the most competent pilot I could possibly have.
Like Elder, I don’t want to second-guess if my CPA, my dentist, or my lawyer know their craft, or maybe have gained their credentials through affirmative action, and I’ll end up being broke, toothless and in prison.
The last thought (with help from Larry Elder).
So, we have progressivism, socialism, communism, marxism, idiotism, cretinism, and…
You tell me which platform is the one that wants to give you choices at school, which platform is more likely to create economic conditions so that you get a job. Which is the platform that pushes victim-hood and that you’re oppressed? And which is the platform that says, you are an individual capable of making your own decisions… If you work hard, stay focused, you’ll be fine in America. Which platform says that?
President Trump granted an hour-long, multi-topic interview to Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo.
The President discusses coronavirus pandemic, reopening of the economy, China’s accountability, trade deals, Flynn vs. Sullivan, the upcoming election, and much more.
Donald Trump Speaks
To Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business.
Published on May 14, 2020
From the President’s interview with Maria Bartiromo: Pres. Trump expresses his opinion on the opposition he’s facing on both sides of the aisle.
I’m running against the Democrats, and I’m running against the media. I’m running against the radical left I’m running against some really stupid Republicans that don’t understand how good they had it.
Yesterday (May 07, 2020), the Justice Department has abandoned the prosecution of the retired Army general Michael Flynn after running “a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information.”
UPDATE May 13, 2020
Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order on Tuesday soliciting “Amicus Curiae” (“friend of the court”) briefs. Dan Bongino explains why Judge Sullivan goes against his own earlier ruling by doing so. (Full show.)
It’s hard to believe that this happened in the United States of America. General Michael Flynn’s life was forever changed. He had to sell his home. He faced financial ruin. His family was even threatened with prosecution.
It appears that, as Tucker Carlson said on his show, gen. Flynn was set-up by corrupt government officials, and his life destroyed because he was viewed as an obstacle in the way of taking pres. Trump and his administration down.
They know Michael Flynn is not a dangerous criminal. If he was a dangerous criminal they’d be working to free him from jail. No, they wanted Flynn crushed purely because he happened to be in the way of the power they seek.
Gen. Flynn is waiting for a judge presiding over his case to sign off on the motion by Justice Department to drop the case against him. Hopefully, all will be buttoned-up and gen. Flynn will be able to start to rebuild his life, including suing everybody responsible for his raw deal.
A.I. is terrifying. It is terrifying, not because of the risk that someday it will go rogue and take control over our (human) lives, but because it could (will?) be used by one group of people against another.
I’ve come across this documentary by accident when googling for something. For whatever reason, Google’s Artificial Intelligence algorithms ruled that this video fits perfectly into the area of my interests. What can I say; Google was right.
The video contains five stories about how artificial intelligence is changing our world. Enjoy the movie; it will scare you to death. 😐
Published on Dec 02, 2019 by PBS
Couple of quotes from In The Age of A.I.
We came into this new world thinking that we were users of social media. It didn’t occur to us that social media was actually using us. We thought that we were searching Google. We had no idea that Google was searching us.
Harvard Business School, Professor
A.I. is a technology that can be used for good and evil. So how do governments limit themselves in, on the one hand, using this A.I. technology and the database to maintain a safe environment for its citizens, but not encroach on an individual’s rights and privacies?
Sinovation Vetures, CEO
So the A.I.s are tools. And they will serve the people who control those tools. If those people’s interests go against the values of democracy, then democracy is in danger.
Nothing in China exists free and clear of the party-state. Those companies can only exist and prosper at the sufferance of the party. And it’s made very explicit that when the party needs them, they either have to respond or they will be dethroned.